As the Presidential race moves from
the primary elections to the general election, this might be a good time to say
a few words about media coverage of the candidates. Media—especially the cable news networks—coverage
of the primary elections raised some questions about journalism in this era. One of the candidates, Donald Trump, has
noted that the heavy media coverage that he has received as an outspoken
celebrity essentially served as free advertising, allowing him to save a great
deal of money on paid advertising.
Similarly, CNN, in particular, seemed to favor Trump in the primaries by
always ensuring that a Trump campaign surrogate was at the table when his
candidacy was discussed.
The challenge for
the general election period—from now through November—is to ensure that the news
media function as journalists and not as either purposeful or accidental
advocates of one campaign or another.
Some thoughts:
·
News media should refrain from showing images of
the candidates every time they are being discussed. This is free advertising for the candidate,
regardless of what is being said. It also
distracts the viewer from attending to what the journalist or experts are
saying. Keep the focus on the
journalistic process and the speakers.
If you must show images of the candidates in the background, given them
equal time on the screen.
·
CNN’s
fairly regular practice of always having a candidate’s surrogate on set during
analysis discussions should be avoided.
The result of having surrogates constantly on set is to destroy any
sense of journalistic objectivity.
Instead, focus on what journalists or objective analysts have to say
about the news.
·
Honor the
ideal of equal time.
·
Refrain from carrying speeches “live.” Instead, record them, fact-check them, and then
report on them. Otherwise, the news
simply becomes a promotional channel for whichever candidate is talking.
·
Fact-checking is a critical role for the news
media in this election, given the lack of trust the the public has for either
candidate. Reporters must see themselves
as giving the public the truth, not just passing on gossip or name-calling. I was glad to see a bit of this on MSNBC
today.
·
Do side-by-side comparisons of proposed policies
and positions. Show people where the
candidates differ—and how they differ—and where they are the same. In other words, make policy positions
important to viewers by taking them seriously.
There was a time—when
network news operated within the structure of large entertainment networks—when
corporate bosses kept a distance from their news operations in order to give
them some credibility. This seems to
have faded in today’s cable environment.
This year, though, we need, more than ever, serious journalism that
educates voters. Here’s hoping . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment